ADHD with substance use
More benefit than risk from treating ADHD in patients with substance use disorder — in both ADHD and substance use symptom reduction.
Published evidence, local service figures, OTOS modelling estimates and assumptions are kept visibly separate. OTOS does not turn modelling into fact.
Four studies and frameworks that directly underpin the OTOS clinical rationale. All published. All traceable.
More benefit than risk from treating ADHD in patients with substance use disorder — in both ADHD and substance use symptom reduction.
NICE guidance supports ADHD assessment and treatment in active substance misuse contexts. Not a barrier — a pathway.
Improvement in addictive disorders at six months after ADHD diagnosis and appropriate treatment. France, 2025.
National policy direction supports clearer pathways, better continuity and shared responsibility across services.
There is more benefit than risk from treating ADHD in patients with substance use disorder, in both ADHD symptom reduction and substance use outcomes. Prevalence of ADHD in addiction cohorts: 23–45%.
NICE guidance supports ADHD assessment and treatment in the context of active substance misuse. Co-occurring substance use is not a contraindication to ADHD diagnosis or treatment.
Improvement in addictive disorders at six months after ADHD diagnosis and appropriate treatment. This is the primary comparator the OTOS pre-pilot is designed to test locally.
"ADHD, when unsupported, is a potent route into educational failure, long-term unemployment, crime, substance misuse, suicide, mental and physical illness. Economic costs to individuals and the government of at least £17 billion are avoidable."
Social return on investment analysis of addiction continuity interventions. Used as a ROI comparator for the OTOS pre-pilot cost model. Subject to local validation.
4,175 adults in structured addiction treatment across Cambridgeshire and Peterborough. Used as the planning denominator for the local risk cohort estimate. Source: CPFT / NDTMS extracted data.
Significant and growing ADHD waiting list within CPFT. Exact figures subject to local validation. The waiting period — not the list length — is the gap OTOS addresses.
Based on NDTMS published addiction denominators (4,175 adults in treatment) applied against RCPsych ADHD prevalence range (23–45%). Planning estimate only. The pre-pilot is designed to validate this locally.
Includes: platform infrastructure, partner coordination, co-production, independent evaluation, data and governance infrastructure, evidence pack for ICB commissioning decision. Not a therapy budget.
Scenario-based modelling only. Not a guaranteed saving or projected outcome. The pre-pilot exists to replace this modelling with locally validated evidence. Do not present as a committed figure.
Hospital to community, analogue to digital, sickness to prevention. OTOS tests this transition at the earliest possible point of contact with services.
Undiagnosed ADHD framed as a major and under-addressed public health issue. Recommends improved identification, continuity and pathway coordination.
Government investment in addiction technology addressing structural fragmentation. OTOS aligns directly with the stated goal of reducing fragmentation in the addiction and mental health pathway.
The OTOS continuity layer is designed to operate naturally in the community health infrastructure described in the 10 Year Plan — lightweight, non-clinical, human-reviewed.